Search for: "KAMAL MUSTAFA" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2023, 7:57 am by Unreported Opinions
Several months after Delaware Omaha was incorporated, Kamal Mustafa, appellant, formed at least two LLCs in as many states—Maryland and Illinois—that, although entirely unrelated to Delaware Omaha, […] The post KAMAL MUSTAFA v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 8:13 am by Unreported Opinions
Approximately one month later, appellee filed a civil action in the Circuit Court for Washington County against Kamal Mustafa, appellant; […] The post KAMAL MUSTAFA, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:33 am by Daily Record Staff
Bierman, and Jabob Geesing (collectively “substitute trustees”), filed their order to docket a foreclosure suit against appellants, Zeshan Mustafa, Fatima Mustafa, and Kamal Mustafa, pertaining to appellants’ property located at 14406 Autumn Branch Terrace, Boyds, MD in the Circuit Court ... [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:39 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Subject matter jurisdiction Kamal and Fatima Mustafa, appellants, appeal from an order issued by the Circuit Court for Montgomery County awarding possession of their home to JPMorgan Chase Bank Association (Chase) following a foreclosure sale. [read post]
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Kamal Mustafa, Chairman and CEO of Invictus Consulting Group, and is based on an Invictus white paper by Mr. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:07 am by Adam Wagner
Babar Ahmad, Haroon Rashid Aswat, Syed Tahla Ahsan and Mustafa Kamal Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v United Kingdom – 24027/07 [2010] ECHR 1067 (6 July 2010) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has delayed the extradition of four men, including the notorious Mustafa Kamal Mustafa (Abu Hamza), from the United Kingdom to the United States due to concerns that long prison sentences and harsh conditions in a “supermax”… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
This case concerns six alleged international terrorist detained in the UK, including the often-publicized case of Mustafa Kamal Mustafa (also known as Abu Hamza), The main points of the decision include the following: "...no violation of Article 3 [of the European Convention on Human Rights (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights as a result of conditions of detention at ADX Florence (a “supermax”… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 10:09 am
The qui tam relator is Kamal Mustafa Al-Sultan, the owner of a Kuwaiti company, an erstwhile partner of PWC. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:00 pm by Steve Hall
"Court: UK must not extradite terror suspects to US," is the AP report written by Robert Weilaard via Google News.An international court on Thursday ordered Britain to hold off on extraditing four terrorism suspects to the United States, saying it must show that life terms without parole in maximum security prisons would not violate Europe's human rights charter.The suspects include three Britons and the Egyptian-born radical cleric Mustafa Kamal Mustafa… [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 10:48 am by Jim Higgins
Potential purposeful government misbillings came to light in 2005 thanks to a qui tam relator, one Kamal Mustafa Al-Sultan whose company partnered with the company that would become Agility. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:53 am by Fraud Fighters
The civil case against Agility began over a decade ago due to the efforts of corporate whistleblower Kamal Mustafa Al Sultan — a former business partner of Agility. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:53 am by Fraud Fighters
The civil case against Agility began over a decade ago due to the efforts of corporate whistleblower Kamal Mustafa Al Sultan — a former business partner of Agility. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:44 am by Adam Wagner
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has rejected radical preacher Abu Hamza’s claim that his 2005-6 trial, at which he was convicted of soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges, was unfair. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011): The European Court of Human Rights has rejected Abu Hamza’s claim that his trial in the United Kingdom for soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges was unfair. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
In Othman (Abu Qatada) v United Kingdom, App. no. 8139/09, 17 January 2012, and again in Babar Ahmad, Haroon Rashid Aswat, Syed Tahla Ahsan and Mustafa Kamal Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v United Kingdom, App. nos. 24027/07, 11949/08 and 36742/08, 10 April 2012, the ECtHR was able to consider a variety of challenges in the context of various DWAs and some ad hoc assurances, including from the US government concerning the death penalty and prison conditions. [read post]